ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL   

Application Status


[NOTE: If the Search result shows No data - The result was empty, then possibly the Application is approved and case number assigned. So search in Case Status for case details of this application.]

Page 1 of 13425 Results 1 - 5 of 67123

Search by Diary No. Order by:  Diary No.

FORM NO. 6

[See Rule 16(1)]

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH

Diary No. : 2543/2023

Associated with :

Case Title:
Ex LME Amit Kumar (216844 B)
v/s
UOICNSNAVPEN OfficePCDA(N)

Nature of Document: OA

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTIFICATION
The papers filed in the following cases have been found on scrutiny to be defective. Hence, it is hereby notified that the Applicant(s)/ Respondent(s) or his/their Legal Practitioner is/are required to rectify the defects in the Registry itself if they are formal in nature or take back the papers for rectification of the defects and representation if they are not formal in nature, within the time shown against each case.

Papers in which Defects are noticed By whom Defects are to be rectified (Litigants) Whether the defects are formal in nature or not Time granted for rectification/ representation Rectified
1 2 3 4 5

Impugned order not marked on documents Advocate. Formal 7 days
Annex A-1 date differs in index from original documents
Annex A-2 illegible
Enrol no of counsel not mentioned on vakalatnama
Welfare stamp of Rs 25 not affixed on vakalatnama
Affidavit in Part-B of OA is not the photocopy of original.
.
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remarks/Renotification (If any):
Date: 28-03-2023
REGISTRAR
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FORM NO. 6

[See Rule 16(1)]

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH

Diary No. : 2547/2023

Associated with : OA 1889/2020

Case Title:
No. 672803-T WO Dhankher Rajpal (Retd)
v/s
UOI & Ors

Nature of Document: Counter Affidavit

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTIFICATION
The papers filed in the following cases have been found on scrutiny to be defective. Hence, it is hereby notified that the Applicant(s)/ Respondent(s) or his/their Legal Practitioner is/are required to rectify the defects in the Registry itself if they are formal in nature or take back the papers for rectification of the defects and representation if they are not formal in nature, within the time shown against each case.

Papers in which Defects are noticed By whom Defects are to be rectified (Litigants) Whether the defects are formal in nature or not Time granted for rectification/ representation Rectified
1 2 3 4 5

Some portion missing/margin not maintained at page 95-100 120 103 Advocate Formal 7 days
+
+
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remarks/Renotification (If any):
Date: 28-03-2023
REGISTRAR
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FORM NO. 6

[See Rule 16(1)]

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH

Diary No. : 2535/2023

Associated with :

Case Title:
IC-36726 Col (TS) Rewati Prasad Rai (Retd)
v/s
MP (5 & 6) AG Br, IHQ of MODUOICOASPCDA(P)

Nature of Document: OA

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTIFICATION
The papers filed in the following cases have been found on scrutiny to be defective. Hence, it is hereby notified that the Applicant(s)/ Respondent(s) or his/their Legal Practitioner is/are required to rectify the defects in the Registry itself if they are formal in nature or take back the papers for rectification of the defects and representation if they are not formal in nature, within the time shown against each case.

Papers in which Defects are noticed By whom Defects are to be rectified (Litigants) Whether the defects are formal in nature or not Time granted for rectification/ representation Rectified
1 2 3 4 5

Welfare stamp of Rs.25/- not affixed on vakalatnama. Adv Formal 7 days
Impugned Order not marked in index & document.
Age of applicant not mentioned at Pg-12,13 & 36.
Pg-14 illegible.
Days of delay not mentioned.
..
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remarks/Renotification (If any):
Date: 28-03-2023
REGISTRAR
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FORM NO. 6

[See Rule 16(1)]

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH

Diary No. : 2537/2023

Associated with :

Case Title:
JC-277775P Ex Sub Maj Swarnjit Singh
v/s
UOICOASSRO, Arty Records, NasikPCDA(P)

Nature of Document: OA

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTIFICATION
The papers filed in the following cases have been found on scrutiny to be defective. Hence, it is hereby notified that the Applicant(s)/ Respondent(s) or his/their Legal Practitioner is/are required to rectify the defects in the Registry itself if they are formal in nature or take back the papers for rectification of the defects and representation if they are not formal in nature, within the time shown against each case.

Papers in which Defects are noticed By whom Defects are to be rectified (Litigants) Whether the defects are formal in nature or not Time granted for rectification/ representation Rectified
1 2 3 4 5

Dates not mentioned in OA. Adv Formal 7 days
Pg-27 to 45 illegible.
..
.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remarks/Renotification (If any):
Date: 28-03-2023
REGISTRAR
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FORM NO. 6

[See Rule 16(1)]

ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH

Diary No. : 2518/2023

Associated with : OA 1545/2016

Case Title:
Ex Hav (Hony Nb sub ) Arvind Mohan & Ors
v/s
UOI & Ors

Nature of Document: Memo of Appearance

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOTIFICATION
The papers filed in the following cases have been found on scrutiny to be defective. Hence, it is hereby notified that the Applicant(s)/ Respondent(s) or his/their Legal Practitioner is/are required to rectify the defects in the Registry itself if they are formal in nature or take back the papers for rectification of the defects and representation if they are not formal in nature, within the time shown against each case.

Papers in which Defects are noticed By whom Defects are to be rectified (Litigants) Whether the defects are formal in nature or not Time granted for rectification/ representation Rectified
1 2 3 4 5

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Remarks/Renotification (If any):
Date:
REGISTRAR
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Page 1 of 13425 Results 1 - 5 of 67123